Skip to main content

Publications search

Found 37151 matches. Displaying 2171-2180
Naik HB
Show All Authors

Distribution of Self-reported Hidradenitis Suppurativa Age at Onset

JAMA DERMATOLOGY 2019 AUG; 155(8):971-973
This cohort study examines the median age at onset of hidradenitis
Park SH
Show All Authors

Arabidopsis ubiquitin-specific proteases UBP12 and UBP13 shape ORE1

NEW PHYTOLOGIST 2019 AUG; 223(3):1447-1460
Nitrogen deficiency (-N) in plants triggers leaf senescence which is
Khan I
Show All Authors

The Vertebrate TLR Supergene Family Evolved Dynamically by Gene

DIVERSITY-BASEL 2019 AUG; 11(8):? Article 131
The vertebrate toll-like receptor (TLRs) supergene family is a
McCabe M
Show All Authors

CE: Original Research: The Clinical Research Nurse: Exploring

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NURSING 2019 AUG; 119(8):24-32
Background: Clinical research nursing is an emerging specialty practice.
Yuan LW
Show All Authors

14-3-3 signal adaptor and scaffold proteins mediate GPCR trafficking

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS 2019 AUG 1; 9(?):? Article 11156
Receptor trafficking is pivotal for the temporal and spatial control of
Baker SK
Show All Authors

Plasminogen mediates communication between the peripheral and central

JOURNAL OF NEUROINFLAMMATION 2019 AUG 28; 16(1):? Article 172
Background Systemic inflammation has been implicated in the progression
Byrd AS
Show All Authors

Specimen Collection for Translational Studies in Hidradenitis

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS 2019 AUG 21; 9(?):? Article 12207
Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory disorder
Pamula MC
Show All Authors

High-resolution imaging reveals how the spindle midzone impacts

JOURNAL OF CELL BIOLOGY 2019 AUG; 218(8):2529-2544
In the spindle midzone, microtubules from opposite half-spindles form
Espadinha D
Show All Authors

Distinct Phenotypic and Genomic Signatures Underlie Contrasting

FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY 2019 AUG 27; 10(?):? Article 1971
Background: Staphylococcus epidermidis is a common skin commensal that
Reich K, Gooderham M, Thaci D, Crowley JJ, Ryan C, Krueger JG, Tsai TF, Flack M, Gu Y, Williams DA, Thompson EHZ, Paul C
Show All Authors

Risankizumab compared with adalimumab in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis (IMMvent): a randomised, double-blind, active-comparator-controlled phase 3 trial.

LANCET 2019 AUG 17; 394(10198):576-586
Psoriasis is an autoimmune disease that affects approximately 100 million people worldwide, and is a disease that can be ameliorated by anti-cytokine treatment. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of risankizumab with adalimumab in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. IMMvent was a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, active-comparator-controlled trial completed at 66 clinics in 11 countries. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older with moderate-to-severe chronic plaque psoriasis. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 using interactive response technology to receive 150 mg risankizumab subcutaneously at weeks 0 and 4 or 80 mg adalimumab subcutaneously at randomisation, then 40 mg at weeks 1, 3, 5, and every other week thereafter during a 16-week double-blind treatment period (part A). For weeks 16-44 (part B), adalimumab intermediate responders were re-randomised 1:1 to continue 40 mg adalimumab or switch to 150 mg risankizumab. In part A, participants and investigators were masked to study treatment. Randomisation was stratified by weight and previous tumour necrosis factor inhibitor exposure. Co-primary endpoints in part A were a 90% improvement from baseline (PASI 90) and a static Physician's Global Assessment (sPGA) score of 0 or 1 at week 16, and for part B was PASI 90 at week 44 (non-responder imputation). Efficacy analyses were done in the intention-to-treat population and safety analyses were done in the safety population (all patients who received at least one dose of study drug or placebo). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02694523. Between March 31, 2016, and Aug 24, 2017, 605 patients were randomly assigned to receive either risankizumab (n=301, 50%) or adalimumab (n=304, 50%). 294 (98%) of patients in the risankizumab group and 291 (96%) in the adalimumab group completed part A, and 51 (96%) of 53 patients re-randomised to risankizumab and 51 (91%) of 56 patients re-randomised to continue adalimumab completed part B. At week 16, PASI 90 was achieved in 218 (72%) of 301 patients given risankizumab and 144 (47%) of 304 patients given adalimumab (adjusted absolute difference 24·9% [95% CI 17·5-32·4]; p<0·0001), and sPGA scores of 0 or 1 were achieved in 252 (84%) patients given risankizumab and 252 (60%) patients given adalimumab (adjusted absolute difference 23·3% [16·6-30·1]; p<0·0001). In part B, among adalimumab intermediate responders, PASI 90 was achieved by 35 (66%) of 53 patients switched to risankizumab and 12 (21%) of 56 patients continuing adalimumab (adjusted absolute difference 45·0% [28·9-61·1]; p<0·0001) at week 44. Adverse events were reported in 168 (56%) of 301 patients given risankizumab and 179 (57%) of 304 patients given adalimumab in part A, and among adalimumab intermediate responders, adverse events were reported in 40 (75%) of 53 patients who switched to risankizumab and 37 (66%) of 56 patients who continued adalimumab in part B. Risankizumab showed significantly greater efficacy than adalimumab in providing skin clearance in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. No additional safety concerns were identified for patients who switched from adalimumab to risankizumab. Treatment with risankizumab provides flexibility in the long-term treatment of psoriasis.